The European Parliament: When the defenders of the sovereignty of states interfere in its internal affairs

Once again, the parties hostile to the kingdom come out for the love of maneuvers, which failed at various previous stations after all the fraudulent plans were exposed to the face of their masters, and revealed the falsity of all the claims of defending the values of democracy and human rights and accompanying heavy slogans that fall in the first test of the credibility of those raised.

The latest maneuvers of the opponents intervene today after the adoption by the European Parliament of amendments to the “report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy – 2022”, including two amendments that directly concern Morocco.

Without going into the specifics of this new story of endless maneuvering, it must be admitted that these amendments are promoted by hostile parties participating in a hostile and restrictive campaign aimed at the kingdom by those who are irritated by Morocco developing and opening up to its regional and international environment.

What is certain today is that Morocco has been warned long ago and on several occasions of this relentless campaign that targets the kingdom directly and exclusively among all Arab and African countries, as Morocco remains the most vulnerable to attacks and targeting, which indicates a bias that is difficult to conceal by raising false cases that exist only in the minds of their owners and those who follow their Mirage.

Indeed, the institution of the European Union has turned into a fighting arena for a group of lobbies that spend generously for those who support amendments and reports against the state that has no oil and gas, but it constantly evolves on solid and legitimate grounds that annoy many sides.

It is truly ironic that those who claim to defend their independence and face foreign interference to preserve their sovereignty are the same ones who, on occasion or without them, are able to intrude into the internal affairs of states, and even strike at the decisions of the judicial authority, even if it is a matter of cases between individuals within the society, where this judicial authority only plays the role of law enforcement without bias for any party.